The letter came from a woman who I will call Myra. Although that is not her name, her real name is Judith.
She was not happy. And by “not happy,” I mean she compared me to the Antichrist.
She emailed a letter which began: “...I can’t believe you’re encouraging children to watch ‘SpongeBob SquarePants’ who promotes a lifestyle of blatant sexual sin… Focus on the Family and the American Family Association say SpongeBob SquarePants is dangerous to our nation’s children...”
The emailer is referring to a recent column wherein I wrote about an 8-year-old who named an injured bird after SpongeBob SquarePants. I apparently made a mistake.
So let me start by saying I am not, to my knowledge, the Antichrist. In fact, I even asked my wife about this.
“Am I the Antichrist?” I asked my wife.
She said, “Did you fold the laundry like I asked?”
“No.”
“Then yes.”
I do, however, admit to liking SpongeBob. I would not go so far as to say that I “encourage” people to watch the show. Not in the
same way I would encourage people to watch, say, “Baywatch.”
But then I was raised by staunch Baptists. There were a lot of TV programs outlawed among my people.
Among them: “Three’s Company,” “Charlie’s Angels,” “Love Boat,” “Fantasy Island,” “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,” “The Simpsons,” “Sesame Street,” Nair commercials, paint drying, and any TV program not entitled “The Lawrence Welk Show.”
But SpongeBob was expressly forbidden. Probably because SpongeBob would always say, “tatar sauce!” Which he often uses as an expletive, instead of saying, for example, “oh, hell!”
Still, SpongeBob happens to be special to my family. I speak here of the first three seasons, which are a masterclass in the art of storytelling.
My history with SpongeBob begins in my teenage years. I had a little sister who loved SpongeBob. I would come home after work, tired and filthy—I worked full-time…